▶💬Guemarastood by way of a miracle? The Gemara answers: Yes, two forms of these letters did exist at that time, but the people di…
stood by way of a miracle?
The Gemara answers: Yes, two forms of these letters did exist at that time, but the people did not know which one of them was to be used in the middle of the word and which at the end of the word, and the Seers came and established that the open forms are to used be in the middle of the word and the closed forms at the end of the word.
The Gemara asks: Ultimately, however, doesn’t the phrase “these are the commandments” (Leviticus 27:34) indicate that a prophet is not permitted to initiate any matter of halakhafrom now on? Rather, it may be suggested that the final letters already existed at the time of the giving of the Torah, but over the course of time the people forgot them, and the prophets then came and reestablished them.
§ The Gemara cites another ruling of Rabbi Yirmeya or Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba. Rabbi Yirmeya said, and some say that it was Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba who said: The Aramaic translation of the Torah used in the synagogues was composed by Onkelos the convert based on the teachings of Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua. The Aramaic translation of the Prophets was composed by Yonatan ben Uzziel based on a tradition going back to the last prophets, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. The Gemara relates that when Yonatan ben Uzziel wrote his translation, Eretz Yisrael quaked over an area of four hundred parasangs [parsa] by four hundred parasangs, and a Divine Voice emerged and said: Who is this who has revealed My secrets to mankind?Yonatan ben Uzziel stood up on his feet and said: I am the one who has revealed Your secrets to mankind through my translation. However, it is revealed and known to You that I did this not for my own honor, and not for the honor of the house of my father, but rather it was for Your honor that I did this, so that discord not increase among the Jewish people. In the absence of an accepted translation, people will disagree about the meaning of obscure verses, but with a translation, the meaning will be clear.
And Yonatan ben Uzziel also sought to reveal a translation of the Writings, but a Divine Voice emerged and said to him: It is enough for you that you translated the Prophets. The Gemara explains: What is the reason that he was denied permission to translate the Writings? Because it has in it a revelation of the end, when the Messiah will arrive. The end is foretold in a cryptic manner in the book of Daniel, and were the book of Daniel translated, the end would become manifestly revealed to all.
The Gemara asks: Was the translation of the Torah really composed by Onkelos the convert? Didn’t Rav Ika bar Avin say that Rav Ḥananel said that Rav said: What is the meaning of that which is written with respect to the days of Ezra: “And they read in the book, the Torah of God, distinctly; and they gave the sense, and they caused them to understand the reading” (Nehemiah 8:8)? The verse should be understood as follows: “And they read in the book, the Torah of God,” this is the scriptural text; “distinctly,” this is the translation, indicating that they immediately translated the text into Aramaic, as was customary during public Torah readings.
“And they gave the sense,” these are the divisions of the text into separate verses. “And they caused them to understand the reading,” these are the cantillation notes, through which the meaning of the text is further clarified. And some say that these are the Masoretic traditions with regard to the manner in which each word is to be written. This indicates that the Aramaic translation already existed at the beginning of the Second Temple period, well before the time of Onkelos. The Gemara answers: The ancient Aramaic translation was forgotten and then Onkelos came and reestablished it.
The Gemara asks: What is different about the translation of Prophets? Why is it that when Onkelos revealed the translation of the Torah, Eretz Yisrael did not quake, and when he revealed the translation of the Prophets, it quaked? The Gemara explains: The meaning of matters discussed in the Torah is clear, and therefore its Aramaic translation did not reveal the meaning of passages that had not been understood previously. Conversely, in the Prophets, there are matters that are clear and there are matters that are obscure, and the Aramaic translation revealed the meaning of obscure passages. The Gemara cites an example of an obscure verse that is clarified by the Aramaic translation: As it is written: “On that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, like the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon” (Zechariah 12:11).
And with regard to that verse, Rav Yosef said: Were it not for the Aramaic translation of this verse, we would not have known what it is saying, as the Bible does not mention any incident involving Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon. The Aramaic translation reads as follows: On that day, the mourning in Jerusalem will be as great as the mourning for Ahab, son of Omri, who was slain by Hadadrimmon, son of Tavrimon, in Ramoth-Gilead, and like the mourning for Josiah, son of Amon, who was slain by Pharaoh the lame in the valley of Megiddon. The translation clarifies that the verse is referring to two separate incidents of mourning, and thereby clarifies the meaning of this verse.
§ The Gemara introduces another statement from the same line of tradition. The verse states: “And I, Daniel, alone saw the vision, for the men who were with me did not see the vision; but a great trembling fell upon them, so that they fled to hide themselves” (Daniel 10:7). Who were these men? The term “men” in the Bible indicates important people; who were they? Rabbi Yirmeya said, and some say that it was Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba who said: These are the prophets Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.
The Gemara comments: In certain ways they, the prophets, were greater than him, Daniel, and in certain ways he, Daniel, was greater than them. They were greater than him, as they were prophets and he was not a prophet. Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi were sent to convey the word of God to the Jewish people, while Daniel was not sent to reveal his visions to others. In another way, however, he was greater than them, as he saw this vision, and they did not see this vision, indicating that his ability to perceive obscure and cryptic visions was greater than theirs.
The Gemara asks: Since they did not see the vision, what is the reason that they were frightened? The Gemara answers: Even though they did not see the vision, their guardian angels saw it, and therefore they sensed that there was something fearful there and they fled.
Ravina said: Learn from this incident that with regard to one who is frightened for no apparent reason, although he does not see anything menacing, his guardian angel sees it, and therefore he should take steps in order to escape the danger. The Gemara asks: What is his remedy? He should recite Shema, which will afford him protection. And if he is standing in a place of filth, where it is prohibited to recite verses from the Torah, he should distance himself four cubits from his current location in order to escape the danger. And if he is not able to do so, let him say the following incantation: The goat of the slaughterhouse is fatter than I am, and if a calamity must fall upon something, it should fall upon it.
§ After this digression, the Gemara returns to the exposition of a verse cited above. Now that you have said that the phrases “every province” and “every city” appear for the purposes of midrashic exposition, for what exposition do the words “every family” appear in that same verse (Esther 9:28)? Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥanina said: These words come to include the priestly and Levitical families, and indicate that they cancel their service in the Temple and come to hear the reading of the Megilla.As Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: The priests at their Temple service, the Levites on their platform in the Temple, where they sung the daily psalm, and the Israelites at their watches, i.e., the group of Israelites, corresponding to the priestly watches, who would come to Jerusalem and gather in other locations as representatives of the entire nation to observe or pray for the success of the Temple service, all cancel their service and come to hear the reading of the Megilla.This is also taught in a baraita: The priests at their service, the Levites on the platform, and the Israelites at their watches, all cancel their service and come to hear the reading of the Megilla. The Sages of the house of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi relied upon the halakha stated here and determined that one cancels his Torah study and comes to hear the reading of the Megilla. They derived this principle by means of an a fortiori inference from the Temple service: Just as one who is engaged in performing service in the Temple, which is very important, cancels his service in order to hear the Megilla, is it not all the more so obvious that one who is engaged in Torah study cancels his study to hear the Megilla?
The Gemara asks: Is the Temple service more important than Torah study? Isn’t it written: “And it came to pass when Joshua was by Jericho that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and behold, a man stood over against him with his sword drawn in his hand. And Joshua went over to him and said to him: Are you for us, or for our adversaries? And he said, No, but I am captain of the host of the Lord, I have come now. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and bowed down” (Joshua 5:13–14).
The Gemara first seeks to clarify the incident described in the verse. How did Joshua do this, i.e., how could he bow to a figure he did not recognize? Didn’t Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi say: It is prohibited for a person to greet his fellow at night if he does not recognize him, as we are concerned that perhaps it is a demon? How did Joshua know that it was not a demon? The Gemara answers: There it was different, as the visitor said to him: But I am captain of the host of the Lord.
The Gemara asks: Perhaps this was a demon and he lied? The Gemara answers: It is learned as a tradition that demons do not utter the name of Heaven for naught, and therefore since the visitor had mentioned the name of God, Joshua was certain that this was indeed an angel.
As for the angel’s mission, the Gemara explains that the angel said to Joshua: Yesterday, i.e., during the afternoon, you neglected the afternoon daily offering due to the impending battle, and now, at night, you have neglected Torah study, and I have come to rebuke you. Joshua said to him: For which of these sins have you come? He said to him: I have come now, indicating that neglecting Torah study is more severe than neglecting to sacrifice the daily offering. Joshua immediately determined to rectify the matter, as the verses states: “And Joshua lodged that night” (Joshua 8:9) “in the midst of the valley [ha’emek]” (Joshua 8:13), and Rabbi Yoḥanan said:
▶🇫🇷Résumé en françaisse produisit-il par miracle ? La Guemara répond : Oui, deux formes de ces lettres existaient à cette époque, mais le peu…
se produisit-il par miracle ?
La Guemara répond : Oui, deux formes de ces lettres existaient à cette époque, mais le peuple ne savait pas laquelle devait être utilisée au milieu du mot et laquelle à la fin du mot, et les Voyants vinrent et établirent que les formes ouvertes doivent être utilisées au milieu du mot et les formes ferméesà la fin du mot.
La Guemara demande : En fin de compte, cependant, l’expression « ce sont là les commandements » (Lévitique 27:34) n’indique-t-elle pas qu’un prophète n’est pas autorisé à initier une quelconque affaire de halakhadésormais ? Plutôt, on peut suggérer que les lettres finales existaient déjà au moment du don de la Torah, mais qu’au fil du temps, le peuple les oublia, et les prophètes alors vinrent et les rétablirent.
§ La Guemara cite une autre décision de Rabbi Yirmeya ou de Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba. Rabbi Yirmeya dit, et certains disent que c’était Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba qui dit : La traduction araméenne de la Torah utilisée dans les synagogues fut composée par Onkelos le prosélyte sur la base des enseignements de Rabbi Eliezer et de Rabbi Yehoshua. La traduction araméenne des Prophètes fut composée par Yonatan ben Uzziel sur la base d’une tradition remontant aux derniers prophètes, Aggée, Zacharie et Malachie. La Guemara rapporte que lorsque Yonatan ben Uzziel écrivit sa traduction, Eretz Yisrael trembla sur une superficie de quatre cents parasanges [parsa] sur quatre cents parasanges, et une Voix divine émergea et dit : Qui est celui qui a révélé Mes secrets à l’humanité ?Yonatan ben Uzziel se leva sur ses pieds et dit : C’est moi qui ai révélé Tes secrets à l’humanité par ma traduction. Cependant, il est révélé et connu devant Toi que je n’ai pas fait cela pour mon propre honneur, ni pour l’honneur de la maison de mon père, mais plutôt c’était pour Ton honneur que j’ai fait cela, afin que la discorde n’augmente pas parmi le peuple juif. En l’absence d’une traduction acceptée, les gens seront en désaccord sur la signification des versets obscurs, mais avec une traduction, le sens sera clair.
Et Yonatan ben Uzziel chercha aussi à révéler une traduction des Écrits, mais une Voix divine émergea et lui dit : Il te suffit d’avoir traduit les Prophètes. La Guemara explique : Quelle est la raison pour laquelle il lui fut refusé de traduire les Écrits ? Parce qu’il y a en eux une révélation de la fin, quand le Messie arrivera. La fin est annoncée de manière cryptique dans le livre de Daniel, et si le livre de Daniel était traduit, la fin serait manifestement révélée à tous.
La Guemara demande : La traduction de la Torah a-t-elle vraiment été composée par Onkelos le prosélyte ? Rav Ika bar Avin n’a-t-il pas dit que Rav Ḥananel a dit que Rav a dit : Quel est le sens de ce qui est écrit à propos des jours d’Ezra : « Et ils lisaient dans le livre, la Torah de Dieu, distinctement ; et ils en donnaient le sens, et ils faisaient comprendre la lecture » (Néhémie 8:8) ? Le verset doit être compris ainsi : « Et ils lisaient dans le livre, la Torah de Dieu », c’est le texte scripturaire ; « distinctement », c’est la traduction, indiquant qu’ils traduisaient immédiatement le texte en araméen, comme c’était la coutume lors des lectures publiques de la Torah.
« Et ils en donnaient le sens », ce sont les divisions du texte en versets séparés. « Et ils faisaient comprendre la lecture », ce sont les notes de cantillation, par lesquelles le sens du texte est davantage clarifié. Et certains disent que ce sont les traditions massorétiques concernant la manière dont chaque mot doit être écrit. Cela indique que la traduction araméenne existait déjà au début de la période du Second Temple, bien avant l’époque d’Onkelos. La Guemara répond : La traduction araméenne ancienne fut oubliée et ensuite Onkelos vint et la rétablit.
La Guemara demande : Quelle est la différence concernant la traduction des Prophètes ? Pourquoi, lorsque Onkelos révéla la traduction de la Torah, Eretz Yisrael ne trembla-t-elle pas, et lorsqu’il révéla la traduction des Prophètes, elle trembla ? La Guemara explique : Le sens des sujets discutés dans la Torah est clair, et donc sa traduction araméenne ne révéla pas le sens de passages qui n’avaient pas été compris auparavant. À l’inverse, dans les Prophètes, il y a des sujets qui sont clairs et des sujets qui sont obscurs, et la traduction araméenne révéla le sens des passages obscurs. La Guemara cite un exemple de verset obscur clarifié par la traduction araméenne : Comme il est écrit : « En ce jour-là, il y aura un grand deuil à Jérusalem, comme le deuil d’Hadadrimmon dans la vallée de Meguiddon » (Zacharie 12:11).
Et à propos de ce verset, Rav Yosef dit : Sans la traduction araméenne de ce verset, nous n’aurions pas su ce qu’il dit, car la Bible ne mentionne aucun incident impliquant Hadadrimmon dans la vallée de Meguiddon. La traduction araméenne se lit ainsi : En ce jour-là, le deuil à Jérusalem sera aussi grand que le deuil pour Achab, fils d’Omri, qui fut tué par Hadadrimmon, fils de Tavrimon, à Ramoth-Galaad, et comme le deuil pour Josias, fils d’Amon, qui fut tué par Pharaon le boiteux dans la vallée de Meguiddon. La traduction clarifie que le verset fait référence à deux incidents de deuil séparés, et clarifie ainsi le sens de ce verset.
§ La Guemara introduit une autre déclaration de la même lignée de tradition. Le verset dit : « Et moi, Daniel, je vis seul la vision, car les hommes qui étaient avec moi ne virent pas la vision ; mais une grande frayeur tomba sur
[...]
▶✝️Réponse ScripturaLe passage de Megillah 3a traite de questions de transmission textuelle et de traduction, non de doctrine fondamentale. …
Le passage de Megillah 3a traite de questions de transmission textuelle et de traduction, non de doctrine fondamentale. L'Écriture affirme que la Torah a été donnée intégralement et parfaitement à Moïse, qui l'a mise par écrit (Exode 24:4 ; Deutéronome 31:9, 24), et qu'il ne fallait rien y ajouter ni en retrancher (Deutéronome 4:2 ; 12:32). La Bible ne précise pas l'histoire des formes finales des lettres hébraïques, mais elle enseigne que les paroles de Dieu sont préservées fidèlement (Psaume 12:7 ; Ésaïe 40:8). Concernant la traduction, l'Écriture montre que la compréhension et l'explication du texte sacré étaient déjà pratiquées par les Lévites, qui « lisaient distinctement dans le livre de la loi de Dieu, et en donnaient le sens pour faire comprendre la lecture » (Néhémie 8:8). Ainsi, la Bible ne contredit pas l'existence de traditions de transmission ou de traduction, mais elle subordonne toute interprétation humaine à l'autorité du texte révélé, qui seul demeure la norme infaillible (Ésaïe 8:20).
Sans Jésus, vous êtes perdu. Mais Christ est mort pour vos péchés et il est ressuscité : recevez-le avant qu'il ne soit trop tard. « Si tu confesses de ta bouche le Seigneur Jésus, et si tu crois dans ton cœur que Dieu l'a ressuscité des morts, tu seras sauvé. » — Romains 10:9