▶📖MishnaThe number of people needed in a city for it to be eligible for a lesser Sanhedrin is 277. This number is based on the o…
The number of people needed in a city for it to be eligible for a lesser Sanhedrin is 277. This number is based on the opinion of Rabbi Neḥemya, who requires 230 men, but requires an additional 47 men in case it happens that the Sages of the court reach a situation where they are not able to arrive at a verdict, and pairs of judges need to be added, potentially increasing the number of judges on the court from 23 to 70, a maximum of 47 additional judges.
The Gemara asks: But isn’t it taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi says: The number of men needed in a city for it to be eligible for a lesser Sanhedrin is 278? The Gemara answers: This is not difficult. Thisbaraita that said Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi requires 277 residents is stated in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, who holds that there are 70 judges on the Great Sanhedrin, and thisbaraita that quoted the number as 278 is stated in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis, who hold that there are 71.
Apropos the opinion of Rabbi Neḥemya, which links the issue of the lesser Sanhedrin with the appointment of the ministers in the wilderness, the Gemara relates: The Sages taught: The verse states: “And place over them ministers of thousands, ministers of hundreds, ministers of fifties, and ministers of tens” (Exodus 18:21). The number of ministers of thousands was 600, as there were 600,000 men in total; the number of ministers of hundreds was 6,000; of ministers of fifties, 12,000, and of ministers of tens, 60,000. Therefore, it is found that the total number of judges of the Jewish people was 78,600, and suitable people were found to fill all of these positions.
The High Priest judges others if he is sufficiently wise, and others judge him when he transgresses. He testifies before the court and others testify concerning him. He performs ḥalitza with his brother’s widow and his brother performs ḥalitza with his wife; and his brother consummates levirate marriage with his wife. But he does not consummate levirate marriage with his brother’s widow, because it is prohibited for him to marry a widow (see Leviticus 21:14), and can therefore never fulfill the mitzva of levirate marriage, as a yevama is by definition a widow.
If a relative of the High Priest dies, he does not follow the bier carrying the corpse, since it is prohibited for the High Priest to become ritually impure even for immediate relatives (see Leviticus 21:11). Rather, once the members of the funeral procession are concealed from sight by turning onto another street, he is revealed on the street they departed, and when they are revealed, then he is concealed, and in this way, he goes out with them until the entrance of the gate of the city, from where they would take out the corpse, since the dead were not buried in Jerusalem. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir.Rabbi Yehuda says: He does not emerge from the Temple at all for the burial of his relatives, as it is stated: “And from the Temple he shall not emerge and will not desecrate the Temple of his God; for the separateness of the oil of the anointment of his God is on him” (Leviticus 21:12).
The mishna continues: And when he consoles others in their mourning when they return from burial, the way of all the people is that they pass by one after another and the mourners stand in a line and are consoled, and the appointed person stands in the middle, between the High Priest and the people. And when he is consoled by others in his mourning, all the people say to him: We are your atonement. And he says to them: May you be blessed from Heaven. And when they comfort him with the first meal after the burial of one of his relatives, all the people recline on the ground as if they are taking his mourning on themselves, and he reclines on the bench out of respect for his status as High Priest.
The mishna continues, enumerating the halakhot pertaining to the king in similar matters: The king does not judge others as a member of a court and others do not judge him, he does not testify and others do not testify concerning him, he does not perform ḥalitza with his brother’s widow and his brother does not perform ḥalitza with his wife, and he does not consummate levirate marriage with his brother’s widow and his brother does not consummate levirate marriage with his wife, as all these actions are not fitting to the honor of his office. Rabbi Yehuda says: These are not restrictions, but his prerogative: If he desired to perform ḥalitza or to consummate levirate marriage, he is remembered for good, as this is to the benefit of his brother’s widow. The Sages said to him: They do not listen to him if he desires to do so, as this affects not only his own honor but that of the kingdom.
And no one may marry a king’s widow, due to his honor. Rabbi Yehuda says: Another king may marry the widow of a king, as we found that King David married the widow of King Saul, as it is stated: “And I have given you the house of your master and the wives of your master in your bosom” (II Samuel 12:8).
▶💬GuemaraThe mishna teaches that the High Priest judges others as a member of a court. The Gemara asks: Isn’t that obvious? Why w…
The mishna teaches that the High Priest judges others as a member of a court. The Gemara asks: Isn’t that obvious? Why would one think that he would be unfit to serve as a judge? The Gemara answers: It was necessary for the mishna to mention the latter clause: And others judge him, and therefore, it taught the related halakha with it. The Gemara objects: This is also obvious; if others do not judge him, how can he judge others? But isn’t it written: “Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together [hitkosheshu vakoshu]” (Zephaniah 2:1); and Reish Lakish says: This verse teaches a moral principle: Adorn [kashet] yourself first, and then adorn others, i.e., one who is not subject to judgment may not judge others.
Rather, neither halakha concerning the High Priest is a novelty. But since the tannawants to teach that the king does not judge others and others do not judge him, he also taught that the High Priest judges others and others judge him. And if you wish, say instead that this teaches us the halakhaas it is taught in a baraita (Tosefta 4:1): A High Priest who killed a person intentionally is killed; if he killed unintentionally, he is exiled to a city of refuge, and he transgresses a positive mitzva and a prohibition, and he is like an ordinary person concerning all of hishalakhot.
The Gemara analyzes the baraita: A High Priest who killed another intentionally is killed. Isn’t that obvious? Why would he be punished differently than other murderers? It was necessary for it to mention the latter clause: If he killed unintentionally, he is exiled, so it taught the related case with it.
The Gemara objects: This is also obvious. The Gemara responds: It was necessary for the baraita to state the latter clause, lest it enter your mind to say: Since it is written about one who kills unintentionally and is exiled to a city of refuge: “And he should dwell in it until the death of the High Priest” (Numbers 35:25), say: Anyone for whom there is a rectification by returning from the city of refuge is exiled, but one for whom there is no rectification by returning is not exiled. The High Priest has no such rectification, as we learned in a mishna (Makkot 11b):
▶🇫🇷Résumé en françaisLa mishna enseigne que le grand prêtre juge les autres en tant que membre d’un tribunal. La Guemara demande : N’est-ce p…
La mishna enseigne que le grand prêtre juge les autres en tant que membre d’un tribunal. La Guemara demande : N’est-ce pas évident ? Pourquoi penserait-on qu’il serait impropre à siéger comme juge ? La Guemara répond : Il était nécessaire que la mishna mentionne la dernière clause : Et les autres le jugent, et donc elle a enseigné la halakha connexe avec elle. La Guemara objecte : Cela est aussi évident ; si les autres ne le jugent pas, comment peut-il juger les autres ? Mais n’est-il pas écrit : « Rassemblez-vous, oui, rassemblez-vous [hitkosheshu vakoshu] » (Sophonie 2:1) ; et Reish Lakish dit : Ce verset enseigne un principe moral : Orne [kashet] toi-même d’abord, et ensuite orne les autres, c’est-à-dire que celui qui n’est pas soumis au jugement ne peut pas juger les autres.
Plutôt, ni l’une ni l’autre halakha concernant le grand prêtre n’est une nouveauté. Mais puisque le tannaveut enseigner que le roi ne juge pas les autres et que les autres ne le jugent pas, il a aussi enseigné que le grand prêtre juge les autres et que les autres le jugent. Et si tu veux, dis plutôt que cela nous apprend la halakhacomme il est enseigné dans une baraita (Tosefta 4:1) : Un grand prêtre qui a tué une personne intentionnellement est mis à mort ; s’il a tué non intentionnellement, il est exilé dans une ville de refuge, et il transgresse une mitsva positive et une interdiction, et il est comme une personne ordinaireconcernant toutes seshalakhot.
La Guemara analyse la baraita : Un grand prêtre qui a tué un autre intentionnellement est mis à mort. N’est-ce pas évident ? Pourquoi serait-il puni différemment des autres meurtriers ? Il était nécessaire pour elle de mentionner la dernière clause : S’il a tué non intentionnellement, il est exilé, donc elle a enseigné le cas connexe avec elle.
La Guemara objecte : Cela est aussi évident. La Guemara répond : Il était nécessaire que la baraita énonce la dernière clause, de peur qu’il entre dans ton esprit de dire : Puisqu’il est écrit à propos de celui qui tue non intentionnellement et est exilé dans une ville de refuge : « Et il y demeurera jusqu’à la mort du grand prêtre » (Nombres 35:25), dis : Quiconque pour qui il y a une rectification par le retour de la ville de refuge est exilé, mais celui pour qui il n’y a pas de rectification par le retour n’est pas exilé. Le grand prêtre n’a pas une telle rectification, comme nous l’avons appris dans une mishna (Makkot 11b) :
▶✝️Réponse ScripturaLa baraita a bien discerné que le grand prêtre, tout consacré qu’il soit, demeure soumis à la Torah comme tout Israélite…
La baraita a bien discerné que le grand prêtre, tout consacré qu’il soit, demeure soumis à la Torah comme tout Israélite : l’homicide involontaire le conduit à l’exil dans une ville de refuge « jusqu’à la mort du grand prêtre » (Nombres 35:25). Cette égalité devant la justice rejoint l’appel prophétique à se rassembler et à s’éprouver soi-même avant de juger autrui (Sophonie 2:1). L’Évangile accomplit cette exigence en Jésus, grand prêtre sans péché (Hébreux 4:15), qui se laisse pourtant juger et condamner pour porter la justice de Dieu en faveur des coupables.
Sans Jésus, vous êtes perdu. Mais Christ est mort pour vos péchés et il est ressuscité : recevez-le avant qu'il ne soit trop tard. « Si tu confesses de ta bouche le Seigneur Jésus, et si tu crois dans ton cœur que Dieu l'a ressuscité des morts, tu seras sauvé. » — Romains 10:9